Home › Functions › Compare MIDB vs FIND

Compare MIDB vs FIND

2 vs

Compare MIDB vs FIND side-by-side — differences, popularity and recommendation

Presets: VLOOKUP vs XLOOKUP SUM vs SUMIFS INDEX vs MATCH vs XLOOKUP IF vs IFS vs SWITCH COUNT vs COUNTA vs COUNTIF AVERAGE vs AVERAGEIF vs AVERAGEIFS MAX vs LARGE vs MIN TEXT vs TEXTJOIN vs CONCAT FILTER vs SORT vs UNIQUE ROUND vs ROUNDUP vs ROUNDDOWN
All functions Pick at least 2 functions
Feature
Text
=MIDB()
Syntax
Text
=FIND()
★ Winner
Syntax
Category
Text text
Text text
Popularity
43 / 100
60 / 100
Views
◉ 8 views
◉ 7 views
Output
Text
Number
Version
All versions
All versions
Volatile
No
No
Dynamic Array
No
No
Description
Returns a portion of text starting at a specified position based on bytes
Finds the position of a text inside another text (case-sensitive)
Syntax
=MIDB(text, start_num, num_bytes)
=FIND(find_text, within_text, [start_num])
Arguments
3 Arguments
text start_num num_bytes
3 Arguments
find_text within_text start_num (Optional)
Examples
1
2
Tips
1
2

★ Recommendation — Winner: =FIND()

=FIND() is recommended based on higher popularity, newer version and Dynamic Array support.

Winner: =FIND()